<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Crescimanno &#187; Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briancrescimanno.com/category/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briancrescimanno.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Web Design, Development, and Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defining &#8220;Support&#8221; for Legacy Browsers</title>
		<link>http://briancrescimanno.com/2009/05/04/defining-support-for-legacy-browsers/</link>
		<comments>http://briancrescimanno.com/2009/05/04/defining-support-for-legacy-browsers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design webdesign browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancrescimanno.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Snook recently posted an interesting article titled Old Browsers: Do they still exist that explores the often hotly-debated topic of when it's ok to pretend a legacy browser no longer exists.
My pragmatism comes into play, like that little devil and angel on my shoulders telling me each side of the story. The fact is, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://briancrescimanno.com/2009/05/04/defining-support-for-legacy-browsers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design for Objectives; Not Requirements</title>
		<link>http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/05/02/design-for-objectives-not-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/05/02/design-for-objectives-not-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briancrescimanno.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was evaluating early design comps for a new project just getting underway here at AutoTrader.com and I fell into the trap of what I call Designing for Requirements, Not Objectives.
Neil and I were discussing the new versions of the comps that have surfaced since we returned from San Francisco and the improvements around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/05/02/design-for-objectives-not-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
