Comments on: Which JS Framework is “The Best” http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/06/27/which-js-framework-is-the-best/ Thoughts on Ajax, Flex, and Rich Internet Applications Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:55:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: teraom http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/06/27/which-js-framework-is-the-best/#comment-261 teraom Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:09:42 +0000 http://briancrescimanno.com/?p=13#comment-261 Scriptaculous is not bad, may be you were introduced to a earlier framework that makes this method awkward. An excellent difference between the moo tools and the jquery, i should probably call jquery the best. cross browser compatibility is another point you might want to add.. Scriptaculous is not bad, may be you were introduced to a earlier framework that makes this method awkward.
An excellent difference between the moo tools and the jquery, i should probably call jquery the best.
cross browser compatibility is another point you might want to add..

]]> By: Spiral http://briancrescimanno.com/2008/06/27/which-js-framework-is-the-best/#comment-227 Spiral Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:33:34 +0000 http://briancrescimanno.com/?p=13#comment-227 Interesting article! While it makes sense in theory, I think the suggestion to evaluate which library is most suitable for each and every project isn't very practical and fails to take into account an individual's experience/familiarity with a particular library. Perhaps library X isn't the ideal choice for project P, but if you have to learn several other frameworks just to be able to determine whether or not it's the right choice, then it might be simpler not to use a library at all. That said, as frameworks become more established, the decision as to which one is most suitable for a specific application might become common knowledge. With this in mind, I tend to think Adobe <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/" rel="nofollow">Spry</a> provides good support for progressive enhancement and SEO, while <a href="http://www.gapjumper.com" rel="nofollow">Gapjumper</a> has some useful (and easy-to-use) animation features. Interesting article! While it makes sense in theory, I think the suggestion to evaluate which library is most suitable for each and every project isn’t very practical and fails to take into account an individual’s experience/familiarity with a particular library. Perhaps library X isn’t the ideal choice for project P, but if you have to learn several other frameworks just to be able to determine whether or not it’s the right choice, then it might be simpler not to use a library at all.

That said, as frameworks become more established, the decision as to which one is most suitable for a specific application might become common knowledge.

With this in mind, I tend to think Adobe Spry provides good support for progressive enhancement and SEO, while Gapjumper has some useful (and easy-to-use) animation features.

]]>